PubliCola Candidate Ratings: Seattle City Council Position 5

By PublicolaPicks October 31, 2011

Sticking with our commitment to be a more objective and balanced source of news, we’re doing things differently this year than we have in the past.

Inspired by the even-keeled Seattle/King County Municipal League’s approach to candidates (rather than endorsing, the Muni League rates based on skill, experience, and policy acumen as opposed to ideology), we’ve been talking to candidates and interviewing folks on both sides of the ballot measures and coming up with our own ratings.

(Here’s our take on I-1125, the tolling initiative, our take on I-1183, the liquor privatization measure, and I-1163, the health care worker training initiative. And here’s our rating of King County Council Position 6 incumbent Jane Hague and her challenger, Richard Mitchell, and our take on the candidates for Seattle City Council Position 1, Seattle City Council Position 3Seattle School Board, and Seattle Port Commission Position 5.)

We’re grading the candidates on: Resume; Knowledge of the Issues; and Their To-Do List & Ability to Get it Done. We’ll also be issuing Bonus Points and Demerits.

Our scale: Exceptional; Above Average; Acceptable; So-so; Unimpressive; Unacceptable.

City Council Position 5

City Council Position 5

Tom Rasmussen (incumbent)

Resume: Above Average

Although he isn’t the flashiest council member, Rasmussen has spent the past four years quietly getting things done—from the transportation benefit district that will fund transit, bike, and road improvements throughout the city, to helping repeal the unfair 40/40/20 Metro funding plan as a member of the regional transit task force, to creating a special district that promotes conservation in the Pike/Pine corridor, to promoting road diets over (unfounded) neighborhood objections, to creating a fund to help people unable to pay their water bills.

Knowledge of the Issues: Exceptional
As transportation chair, Rasmussen has made himself the city’s expert on every issue related to the city’s transportation system. The fact that Gov. Gregoire chose Rasmussen (and not Mayor McGinn) to represent the city on the group that’s planning next year’s state transportation package is a testament to his superior knowledge on the subject—not to mention land use, parks, human services, and housing.

To-Do List & ability to get it done: Exceptional
In our interview, Rasmussen rattled off a list of legislation he’d like to pass, include creating a system where developers can sell off their rights to build taller in exchange for agreeing to preserve historic buildings; cracking down on aggressive nonprofit solicitors; fully funding and implementing the pedestrian and bike master plans; and crafting a transportation benefit district that restores the city’s commitment to transit, bike infrastructure, sidewalks, and basic road maintenance. Additionally, he's proposed a street-level plan to improve public safety and transit operations on Third Ave. downtown, including better street lighting, longer bus stops (to activate more of the street), more police officers on Third, and funding for cleanup and graffiti removal. Based on Rasmussen's record, we have confidence in his ability to get his ambitious to-do list done.

Bonus Points
Rasmussen is ubiquitous, showing up at events even his most dedicated colleagues skip---walking through neighborhoods to get a street-level look at crime hot spots and density, going on ride-alongs with the Neighborhood Corrections Initiative to learn more about street offenders downtown, and holding open-format morning events around the Seattle to familiarize himself with neighborhood concerns throughout the city.


In our interview, Rasmussen made a very dated argument against too much density at light rail stations (even citing the Seattle Displacement Coalition’s John Fox)—namely, that density will push families out of neighborhoods and destroy the character of single-family areas. This is 2011, not 1999.

Dale Pusey

Resume: Unimpressive
Pusey is an accountant who moved to Seattle from Florida five years ago. As his main qualification for city council, he cites the fact that he rode his bike across the country and “encountered a wide variety of dangerous challenges … including wildlife” and met a variety of different types of people.

Knowledge of the Issues: So-so
Other than vague statements about “reducing taxes and fees” during the recession and “improving transportation,” Pusey’s knowledge of the issues he’d face on the council is limited; indeed, he answered many of our questions with a long pause followed by some version of “I don’t have a specific opinion on that.”

To-do List & Ability to Get it Done: Unimpressive
Pusey appears to have two or three specific agenda items: keep the viaduct up and turn it into a two-level, elevated public park; roll back downtown parking rates; and relocate bike lanes to non-arterial streets. None of those ideas currently has any support on the council, and Pusey lacks the knowledge and political acumen to rally council members around his agenda.

Bonus Points
He bikes to work in Bellevue from his home in Delridge, and back, every day—a 26-mile round trip. That’s dedication!

A park on the viaduct? Really?

Filed under
Show Comments