As everyone knows, the No. 1 maxim of journalism (thanks Hal Holbrook) is "follow the money."
Sadly, as the New York Times demonstrated this weekend, you no longer can. NYT reporter Mike McIntire set out, a la Michael Moore in Roger & Me to find out who was funding an anti-health care reform TV ad sponsored by a group called Coalition to Protect Seniors. He couldn't do it. Why? Because nonprofits don't have to disclose their donors.
This hasn't been much of a problem in the past because nonprofits are, well, nonprofits—and they didn't have a lot of cash lying around to fund political hit pieces. Political Action Committees could contribute, but PAC contributions were limited and disclosable on their end.
However, the recent Citizens United ruling has allowed corporations to directly fund these TV ads (known legally as "electioneering communication") without any limits or disclosure requirements.
These new rules have had an effect in this year's U.S. Senate race here in Washington State. There have been four such ads against Sen. Patty Murray. (There has been one independent ad against Dino Rossi, but because the group, called Commonsense 10, filed as an independent expenditure committee with the Federal Elections Commission, they are required to disclose their donors.)
Murray has been hit by: a $1.4 million ad buy from Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS; a $750,000 ad buy from a group called American Action Network; a $300,000 ad buy from a group called Truth in Politics; and a $300,000 ad buy from the National Taxpayers Union.
That's $2.7 million in political ads. And the public has no idea who's paying for them.
The anti-Rossi ad cost Commonsense 10 $400,000. Commonsense 10 has registered with the Federal Election Commission, which means they will eventually have to disclose their donors.
The Democrats sponsored a bill this year called the DISCLOSE Act, which would have forced the top donors who pay for any ad to identify themselves—the same way politicians have to do in their own ads. So, for example, if Goldman Sachs funds an ad by a group called Main Street for Real Wall Street Reform, the CEO of Goldman Sachs would have to sign off on it. Likewise if a big union funds an ad.
However, the Republicans filibustered and killed the bill late last month.
- Advertisement -
OTHER POPULAR CONTENT
25 Drop-Dead Extraordinary Sandwiches
The 30 Seattle Restaurant Experiences You Must Have Before You Die
The Waterfront Gondola is Really Happening (Probably)
Judy Travis Is the 21st Century Video Star
The Working Stiff's Guide to Lunch in the City
Bryn Lumsden Will Open Damn the Weather in Pioneer Square
Morning Fizz: Former Democratic House Member to Run as Republican
The Pedestrian Chronicles: The Pike-Pine Corridor
The Top Things to Do This Weekend: Mar 6–9
Morning Fizz: "The Troubling Part Is..."
Hangout Shop at Love City Love
One Question for Sen. Marko Liias About Whether Sound Transit Should Subsidize Parking
- 25 Drop-Dead Extraordinary Sandwiches
- The 30 Seattle Restaurant Experiences You Must Have Before You Die
- The Waterfront Gondola is Really Happening (Probably)
- Judy Travis Is the 21st Century Video Star
- The Working Stiff's Guide to Lunch in the City
- Bryn Lumsden Will Open Damn the Weather in Pioneer Square
- Morning Fizz: Former Democratic House Member to Run as Republican
- The Pedestrian Chronicles: The Pike-Pine Corridor
- Advertisement -
Most popularSlide Shows & Videos
- Advertisement -